Connoisseur compares cupcakes
Thursday, February 4, 2010 – 13:00 | No Comment

Anybody who knows me as more than a Facebook friend probably knows I heart cake. I really do. I’m a sucker for it. I never make or buy a cake because I know I’ll eat …

Read the full story »
Arts & Entertainment

Movies, music and trends — all the stuff you really care about — or at least you should.

Issues & Ideas

Join the conversation with the Daily Universe Issues and Ideas editor.

Life & Living

From going green to getting crafty, enhance your life from day to day.

News & Politics

National, local and hard-hitting. The events affecting your daily life.

Sports & Adventure

Your teams, your sports, your passion — it’s all sweat, blood, and bruises in here.

Home » Featured, News & Politics

Cash for Careless officials

Submitted by Natali Wyson on Tuesday, 3 November 20093 Comments

Almost a year has passed since the Obama Administration has come into power and what has Obama accomplished?  Well, he won the Nobel peace prize … and passed a stimulus package that so far looks to have been what critics predicted: a pointless increase in the nation’s debt to be placed on the shoulders of our children.
Even “Cash for Clunkers,” one program which has been largely praised as a success, looks to be, upon further examination, not quite as profitable as the Administration boasts, and possibly even a negative stimulus.  Based on analyses by automotive consumer researchers, tax dollars ended up paying an average of  $24,000 for each of the 125,000 cars sold under “Cash for Clunkers” that would not have been sold without it. It appears that this stimulus was less for the growth of the economy and more for the growth of government.

“For that price, the federal government could have purchased the 125,000 cars outright at manufacturer suggested retail prices, such as a Ford Fusion, Focus or even a Mustang, and then handed each of the recipients an additional bonus check averaging the Cash-for-Clunkers subsidy of $4,000. Or they could have bought every one of those 125,000 people a Smart car and then given them a check for $6,000.”
-    thenewamerican.com

The main point really comes down to this: a government cannot take money from its citizens, then turn around and give small portions back to them, and call that a recovery. The most efficient way to accomplish an economic stimulus would be to simply allow the people to keep their money in the first place.
Although the Obama Administration is touting the success of their stimulus because earnings are up, this is really just because companies have fired half their workforce, so they’re getting a better bottom line while still bringing in lower revenues.  In the human sense, the economy picks up when employment improves, and that is still getting worse. What do the numbers matter if people are out of work?

It seems the Obama Adminisration needs to go back to kindergarten to learn the same lesson in economics that was taught to me during that intense first year of education. In my kindergarten class, we were all given a certain amount of money to use at our imaginary grocery store. We were told we could buy whatever we wanted with that money.  But of course, in the end, we learned a very heartbreaking lesson: when you run out of money, you can’t buy anything else.

The reality of our current situation is that we as a people have simply run out of money, and unlike my kindergarten teacher, you can’t just print more of it. Actually you can print more, but as one clever observer noted, it is like taking a bucket of water out of the deep end of the pool and pouring it into the shallow end in hopes of raising the level.  Rather we just need to do as the kindergartners — work hard and wait patiently for earnings to increase.

3 Comments »

  • Reed said:

    I wish the Government would have bought my clunker, bought me a $24,000 dollar car, then given me a $4,000 check! The thing about all this is that by trying to get out of the economic slump we are in, all the actions are just putting us further and further into debt. We are still paying for FDR’s “Stimulus Package” and our kids will pay for what we (or our government) do today. I agree. Let’s go back to the basics which is roll up our sleeves, work hard, and help the people believe in the economy again.

  • sham wow said:

    Right on Natali, great article. You write articles like you sell dish network!

  • Justin Skidmore said:

    One problem with the government trying to “fix” the economy with a stimulus is that it tries to preserve the structure of the economy as it is now. It tries to keep car companies and business and house prices up just like they were for the last decade. But the seeming prosperity of the last decade was the result of an artificial boom created by loose monetary policy. The market is trying to correct for all the bad investments that were made during that boom, and the government doing everything it can to stop it. The government is trying to sustain something that is inherently unsustainable. The structure of the economy is broken–it needs to change. The government doesn’t know how to do that, but the market does.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.